Talk:Imperial Military Reform Policy

I find it absolutely amazing that you wait exactly one year to remove that. If you look under the history tab, and go to the February 2007 date, you would see that, at the end, TIE Avenger is listed there. Yet you said absolutely nothing of it. In 14 ABY, I was pushing for major reforms ICly - I introduced the ST-III, I phased out the old Mark I, and I pushed heavily for the production of TIE Avengers, going as far as to create the stats for them and sending them to Minkar/Cypher. It would appear as if those stats were put to good use, as the stats I created are practically identical - only alteration being a -1 pip to fire control for the missiles and a slightly improved sensor range. And I was ICly pushing for Avengers, because they did exist ICly. And, in case you didn't know, so do TIE Defenders. They were used ICly (non-coded, naturally) during a battle, with pre-approval from both sides. So please refrain from deleting information that's been here for a year already and isn't wrong. --Danik Kreldin 05:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)